Independent electoral verification · EN / ES / PT

Make the electoral record legible, and defensible.

Veridian Electoral verifies tally sheets, aggregates independently and states its coverage, keeps chain-of-custody evidence bundles, and reconciles against the official record. We publish what the evidence supports and log what it does not.

Request an engagement Read how it holds up

Nonpartisan. No win-calls. No candidate and no party is named anywhere in a Veridian surface.

Engagements

What we verify, and how it is bought

Scope, artifact, and refusal conditions are fixed in writing before an engagement begins. Engagements are contracted per election, per country — always whole, never detached pieces.

Engagement A

ERM engagement

Election-night results verification, sold whole: field capture with a chain-of-custody trail, tally-sheet verification, independent aggregation with stated intervals, and audit-reconciliation against the official record, delivered as a sealed evidence bundle.

Artifact · verification report + evidence bundle

What we verify →

Engagement B

Evidence package — retainer + activation

A standing retainer that keeps custody, protocol, and staffing ready; activation on a declared contest date produces one tamper-evident, hash-verifiable bundle. The retainer buys readiness, not a figure.

Artifact · activation-ready custody chain

The evidence package →

Engagement C

Media results feed

An aggregate-only feed for media consortia: totals, coverage, and provenance for every figure. No win-calls, no projections, no candidate-level commentary — editorial judgment stays in the newsroom.

Artifact · aggregate feed + interval log

Engagement D

Observer / EOM kit

Field kit for observer missions: tally-sheet capture forms, custody events, and a reconciliation view that shows where the official record and the observed record differ.

Artifact · observer forms + reconciliation view

How it holds up

Proven in production, stated exactly

One national engagement at full scale. The figures below are the certified record and the operator's monitoring log from the engagement, not a summary of them.

Engagement record · June 2026 Certified

Certified margin

251,854 votes
CNE · Resolución E-3181 · 24 Jun 2026

Margin by vote share

~0.95 % of valid votes
Per the CNE record

Monitor runs, health OK

~42 automated runs
Operator's monitoring log · 21–24 Jun 2026

Contest: June 2026 Colombian presidential runoff.
Historical placement: Narrowest second-round margin by vote share. 1994 was closer in absolute votes: 156,585.
Certification: Certified by the CNE in Resolución E-3181; proclaimed 24 Jun 2026. A nullity demand against the declaration was admitted by the Consejo de Estado (Sección Quinta) on 24 July 2026 and is pending; there is no merits ruling and the election's effects are not suspended. Veridian takes no position on the case. (wording pending counsel review)
Challenge: A challenge covering approximately 33,000 polling stations was filed. The count-stage petitions were withdrawn; the nullity demand above is pending.
Count reproduction: The final official count reproduced the preliminary count to within approximately 0.003 %, per the CNE record.
Parties named: None. No candidate and no party is named in any Veridian label, figure, or exhibit.
Who the client was: A principal in the contest. The engagement ran in June 2026 under the operator's campaign-side product, three months before the Veridian name was adopted (September 2026). It is shown here for its evidence chain, not as a neutral engagement. (wording pending counsel review)

Every figure in this box is the electoral authority's. No competing figure was published, and this page makes no claim about the outcome.

Across the four-day count window, a national field-capture and evidence-chain operation ran in production, and every number the operator's automated monitor surfaced carried a provenance marker or a logged N/A — it never estimated what it could not see.

The operator's limitation, disclosed here

Automated tally-sheet verification has not run live at national scale.

It is simulation-proven: a three-tally-sheet live demonstration, plus a pipeline designed for national scale. That is the whole of the evidence. We state it here rather than let a buyer discover it in procurement. Track record, including what did not run →

Neutrality

Neutrality is enforced, not asserted

Neutrality here is a set of controls with logged results, not a sentence in a brochure: one isolated tenant per engagement with zero cross-tenant reads, tested by a CI sweep that runs on every schema migration; same-race dual-engagement exclusion declared at intake and cross-checked before contract; written disclosure of the two-brand structure and the infrastructure both share; no characterization of any political actor.

Read the neutrality controls

Pricing

ERM engagement from US$75,000, published floor.

The floor is published because a price a buyer cannot see is a price they cannot compare. Scope above the floor is quoted against the artifact list, never against the contest.

The card →

Request an engagement

Tell us the contest, the date, and the artifact you need. We reply with scope, refusal conditions, and a price against the published floor.

Request an engagement

[email protected]

One address. No press, regional, or role aliases.